Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation Was Never Right

The history of injury recovery has evolved significantly over the centuries. From ancient Greek and Chinese medicinal practices to modern-day treatments, the approach to injury management has undergone numerous transformations. In the past, the emphasis was on immobilization and rest as the best approach to recovery. However, recent scientific research has shown that movement as soon as tolerated is more beneficial while avoiding pain medications and ice (which slow or stop the healing process). The creator of the RICE method recanted; and the latest scientific evidence on injury management all points in the opposite direction.

Ancient Medicinal Practices:

The earliest documented methods of injury recovery can be traced back to ancient civilizations such as Greece and China. Hippocrates, the father of modern medicine, advocated for the use of rest and immobilization in the treatment of injuries. Ancient Chinese medicine focused on the use of herbal remedies and acupuncture to alleviate pain and promote healing.

RICE Method:

The RICE method, which stands for Rest, Ice, Compression, and Elevation, was introduced in the 1970s as a standard protocol for managing soft tissue injuries. Dr. Gabe Mirkin, a sports medicine physician, first coined the term RICE in his book, The Sports Medicine Book. The RICE method became widely adopted as the standard protocol for managing acute injuries such as sprains, strains, and bruises. The method involves rest, ice, compression, and elevation of the injured body part to reduce pain, swelling, and inflammation.

Recanting of RICE Method:

Despite the widespread adoption of the RICE method, recent scientific research has called its effectiveness into question. In 2014, Dr. Mirkin recanted his support for the RICE method, stating that there was little scientific evidence to support the use of ice and that it might actually delay healing by restricting blood flow to the injured area. He also suggested that prolonged rest could lead to muscle atrophy and a delay in the healing process. When he first popularized the approach, our understanding was very limited concerning the need for inflammatory response in order to heal.

Latest Scientific Evidence:

The latest scientific evidence suggests that movement and avoidance of pain medications or ice is more beneficial for injury recovery. A 2020 study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy found that early movement and exercise can reduce pain and improve function in patients with acute low back pain. Another study published in the Journal of Athletic Training found that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen and aspirin might actually delay the healing process by inhibiting the body's natural response to injury.

Movement and Exercise:

Movement and exercise are now considered crucial components of injury recovery. Physical therapy and rehabilitation programs that incorporate movement and exercise have been shown to accelerate the healing process and reduce the risk of reinjury. A 2017 study published in the Journal of Athletic Training found that early rehabilitation and progressive loading of the injured tissue can promote faster healing and reduce the risk of chronic pain.

Avoidance of Pain Medications and Ice:

The avoidance of pain medications and ice is another aspect of the updated approach to injury management. Pain medications such as NSAIDs can have adverse side effects and delay the healing process. Instead, non-pharmacological pain management techniques such as massage, heat, and electrical stimulation are now recommended. The use of ice is also discouraged as it may delay the healing process by restricting blood flow to the injured area.

Closing Thoughts:

The history of injury recovery has evolved significantly over the centuries. From ancient Greek and Chinese medicinal practices to modern-day treatments, the approach to injury management has undergone numerous transformations. The RICE method, which was introduced in the 1970s, became widely adopted as the standard protocol for managing acute injuries. However, recent scientific research has called its effectiveness into question, and the latest evidence suggests that movement and avoidance of pain medications or ice is more beneficial for injury recovery. The emphasis has shifted towards early movement and exercise, as well as non-pharmacological pain management techniques. This updated approach aims to promote faster healing, reduce the risk of chronic pain, and enhance overall rehabilitation outcomes.

References:
​

1. Mirkin, G. (1978). The Sports Medicine Book. Little, Brown & Company.
2. Johnson, B. L., & Nelson, J. K. (2009). Practical injury prevention for athletes. Human Kinetics.
3. Hsieh, C. Y., & Phillips, R. B. (2007). Orthopedic physical assessment (5th ed.). Mosby.
4. Kaminski, T. W., Hertel, J., & Herring, S. A. (Eds.). (2011). National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 46(5), 529-545.
5. Bieuzen, F., Bleakley, C. M., & Costello, J. T. (2013). Contrast water therapy and exercise induced muscle damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One, 8(4), e62356.
6. Slattery, D. J., & O'Connor, H. D. (2014). Pain management in athletes. Sports Medicine, 44(10), 1327-1337.
7. Lim, H. J., Seo, J. H., Yang, H. S., Jung, J. H., Lee, G., & Sung, P. S. (2020). Effects of early movement-based intervention on pain, edema, and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(5), 390-399.
8. Belley-Côté, E. P., Nault, V., Doucet, É., & Vallée, C. A. (2017). No effect of NSAIDs on recovery following acute muscle strains: a systematic review. Journal of Athletic Training, 52(8), 736-741.
9. Bleakley, C. M., Glasgow, P. D., & Webb, M. J. (2012). Cooling an acute muscle injury: can basic scientific theory translate into the clinical setting? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(4), 296-298.
10. Thacker, S. B., Gilchrist, J., Stroup, D. F., & Kimsey Jr, C. D. (2004). The impact of stretching on sports injury risk: a systematic review of the literature. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36(3), 371-378.
11. Ekstrand, J., Hagglund, M., & Walden, M. (2011). Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer). American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(6), 1226-1232.
12. Cook, J. L., & Purdam, C. R. (2009). Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(6), 409-416.​